Dedicated Roman Gladiator Superfans Were the Football Hooligans of Their Day

 John Pearce/The Conversation

In the amphitheatre of Gladiator II, Ridley Scott trains his lens on fighters and emperors – but no account of ancient gladiators is complete without including its devotees.

Eclipsing the modern superfan in adulation for their heroes, fans massed in the amphitheater to see their favorites fight, taking on a mania that created a potential for disaster. According to the Roman historian Tacitus, in AD27 a poorly built arena at Fidenae, just outside Rome, collapsed under the spectators’ weight. The incident left 50,000 dead or injured.

But gladiator fandom extended well beyond the arena. In the summer of 2019, archaeologists uncovered a tavern in Pompeii that had been decorated to show the bloody outcome of a gladiator fight. This hints at the way “sports talk” pervaded life in that city.

There’s more evidence in Roman author Petronius’s mid-first-century BC satire The Satyricon. His fictional freedmen banter about the merits of various fighters over dinner. The ubiquitous gladiator motifs found on Roman wine cups show that this kind of convivial exchange over food and drinks was common.

Their passion could, however, turn fans from drinkers into fighters. At Pollentia (modern day Majorca), Emperor Tiberius needed soldiers to quell riots borne of frustration at the absence of gladiators from a local bigwig’s funeral.

Much like modern-day football hooliganism, gladiator fandom could be weaponized in intercommunal violence. In a 59 BC gladiatorial show, Pompeians murderously assaulted their neighbors from Nuceria (modern day Nocera, near Naples), causing games to be banned at Pompeii and leading to exile for the instigator.

A fresco depicting the AD59 riot between Pompeiians and Nucerians in the Pompeii amphitheater that took place following a gladiatorial show, from the National Archaeological Museum Naples. (Chappsnet/CC BY-SA 4.0).

Fan Favorites

Fans were drawn to Roman gladiators for more than just their fighting skills. Stage names could emphasise their good looks, lent by physique, coiffure and armor. Pearl and Emerald, for example, sparkled with jewel-like luster. Callimorphus flaunted his peerless body and Chrysomallos and Xanthos their blonde locks.

It was common for Romans to illustrate the erotic appeal of a gladiator by naming the Roman women who, metaphorically, lost their heads to fighters. The Roman poet Juvenal wrote of the fictional, or perhaps fictionalized, wife of a Roman senator, Eppia, who allegedly preferred the battered arena veteran Sergius to her husband.

Meanwhile Faustina, wife of Marcus Aurelius, is said in a 4th century biography of the emperor to have confessed a passion for gladiators to her husband.

But these examples more reliably testify to elite male misogyny than to ancient reality. Seating regulations may have confined them to the higher tiers of the amphitheatres, but many women likely also had an interest in combat itself. Some were perhaps authors of the gladiatorial graffiti still legible on Pompeii’s walls.

Tombstones tell a less sensational story of gladiators’ sex lives, where their partnerships are described by the language of respectable matrimony.

Who Were the Gladiator Superfans?

Gladiator fans could be found in all strata of Roman society. But the voices of elite fans are loudest today, as they were preserved in literary texts. Members of powerful families and emperors well knew that they must put on gladiatorial and other games, since presiding at them was central to effective political theater.

Roman Terrocota lamp from first century AD featuring engraved image of Roman gladiator. Metropolitan Museum of Art/CC0 1.0).

Wary of Julius Caesar’s reputation for having obvious disdain for gladiatorial combat, Emperor Augustus was instead a visibly enthused spectator. The crowd’s acclaim for his generosity and its appreciation of his sharing common pleasures helped to bolster the emperor’s authority. At the Colosseum, senators could see how the political land lay as the emperor was applauded (or not) by the public.

Some emperors appreciated fighting technique close up. Titus was a fan of the parmularius (the “small shield” men), while his brother Domitian preferred the heavier-armed murmillones, named after the fish-like crest on their helmets.

But when they addressed the subject of gladiators directly, most elite men were ambivalent. Pagan and Christian authors, including Seneca and St Augustine, had no qualms over the shedding of gladiatorial blood. But they did regret the loss of reason among their peers as spectators, heady with emotion at the sight of the slaughter.

The genre in which these authors wrote also dictated what they said. Seneca, like Cicero, turned gladiators into philosophical examples, persevering in combat despite the vagaries of fortune.

Statue of Roman gladiator from Roman Europe. (Gary Todd/CC0 1.0)

But incidental literary references suggest that Roman elite males were closely acquainted with real gladiatorial nitty-gritty. Instructing would-be lawyers, for example, the Roman educator Quintilian reached for a gladiator’s fencing steps as a metaphor for a well-rehearsed argument.

Exceptionally well-preserved graffiti discovered on houses and tombs in Pompeii has brought us closer to understanding the ordinary fans of gladiators. In particular, the drawings of armored combatants, which are captioned with their names, types and schools.

Thoroughly versed in performer biographies, fans counted fights, wins and reprieves. This affinity went beyond individuals – men of the same status, neighborhood or town crowded the stepped seating of the amphitheatres together, vociferously unified by ecstasy at a favorite’s success, or anguish at their defeat and death.

Yet while cinema foregrounds gladiators in our modern consciousness, ancient fans likely reserved greater passion for other performers – above all those who starred in theater and chariot racing.

When Roman authors, such as Pliny, decried the triviality of popular obsessions, it was chariot racing that came first to mind. And factions linked to chariot teams threatened political order on a scale never equaled by what happened in the amphitheater. No known gladiator aficionado came close, for example, to the devoted fan who threw himself onto the burning pyre of his favorite chariot driver.

Top image: Interior of the Roman Colosseum, the most famous stadium to host gladiator games.

Source: Fubar Obfusco/Public Domain.

This article was originally published under the title ‘Dedicated Roman Gladiator Superfans Were the Football Hooligans of Their Day’ by John Pearce on The Conversation, and has been republished under a Creative Commons license.