Anav, A. et al. Spatiotemporal patterns of terrestrial gross primary production: a review. Rev. Geophys. 53, 785–818 (2015).
Trabalka, J. R. Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and the Global Carbon Cycle (US Department of Energy, 1986).
Bolin, B. & Fung, I. The Carbon Cycle Revisited Vol. 3 (University Corp. for Atmospheric Research, 1992).
Beer, C. et al. Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: global distribution and covariation with climate. Science 329, 834–838 (2010).
Jung, M. et al. Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe: synthesis and evaluation of the FLUXCOM approach. Biogeosciences 17, 1343–1365 (2020).
Ryu, Y., Berry, J. A. & Baldocchi, D. D. What is global photosynthesis? History, uncertainties and opportunities. Remote Sens. Environ. 223, 95–114 (2019).
Welp, L. R. et al. Interannual variability in the oxygen isotopes of atmospheric CO2 driven by El Niño. Nature 477, 579–582 (2011).
Jian, J. et al. Historically inconsistent productivity and respiration fluxes in the global terrestrial carbon cycle. Nat. Commun. 13, 1733 (2022).
Friedlingstein, P. et al. Climate–carbon cycle feedback analysis: results from the C4MIP model intercomparison. J. Clim. 19, 3337–3353 (2006).
Campbell, J. E. et al. Large historical growth in global terrestrial gross primary production. Nature 544, 84–87 (2017).
Zhang-Zheng, H. et al. Contrasting carbon cycle along tropical forest aridity gradients in West Africa and Amazonia. Nat. Commun. 15, 3158 (2024).
Canadell, J. G. et al. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (ed. Brovkin, V.) Ch. 5 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).
Chen, M. et al. Regional contribution to variability and trends of global gross primary productivity. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 105005 (2017).
Hilton, T. W. et al. Peak growing season gross uptake of carbon in North America is largest in the Midwest USA. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 450–454 (2017).
Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global carbon budget 2023. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 15, 5301–5369 (2023).
Berry, J. et al. A coupled model of the global cycles of carbonyl sulfide and CO2: a possible new window on the carbon cycle. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 118, 842–852 (2013).
Whelan, M. E. et al. Reviews and syntheses: carbonyl sulfide as a multi-scale tracer for carbon and water cycles. Biogeosciences 15, 3625–3657 (2018).
Wehr, R. et al. Dynamics of canopy stomatal conductance, transpiration, and evaporation in a temperate deciduous forest, validated by carbonyl sulfide uptake. Biogeosciences 14, 389–401 (2017).
Medlyn, B. E. et al. Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance. Glob. Chang. Biol. 17, 2134–2144 (2011).
Knauer, J. et al. Mesophyll conductance in land surface models: effects on photosynthesis and transpiration. Plant J. 101, 858–873 (2020).
Sun, Y. et al. Asymmetrical effects of mesophyll conductance on fundamental photosynthetic parameters and their relationships estimated from leaf gas exchange measurements. Plant Cell Environ. 37, 978–994 (2014).
Jähne, B., Heinz, G. & Dietrich, W. Measurement of the diffusion coefficients of sparingly soluble gases in water. J. Geophys. Res. 92, 10767–10776 (1987).
Ulshöfer, V. S., Flock, O. R., Uher, G. & Andreae, M. O. Photochemical production and air-sea exchange of carbonyl sulfide in the eastern Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Chem. 53, 25–39 (1996).
Sun, Y. et al. Impact of mesophyll diffusion on estimated global land CO2 fertilization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 15774–15779 (2014).
Kooijmans, L. M. J. et al. Evaluation of carbonyl sulfide biosphere exchange in the Simple Biosphere Model (SiB4). Biogeosciences 18, 6547–6565 (2021).
Sun, W., Maseyk, K., Lett, C. & Seibt, U. Stomatal control of leaf fluxes of carbonyl sulfide and CO2 in a Typha freshwater marsh. Biogeosciences 15, 3277–3291 (2018).
Maseyk, K. et al. Sources and sinks of carbonyl sulfide in an agricultural field in the Southern Great Plains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 9064–9069 (2014).
Kooijmans, L. M. J. et al. Canopy uptake dominates nighttime carbonyl sulfide fluxes in a boreal forest. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 11453–11465 (2017).
Stimler, K., Berry, J. A., Montzka, S. A. & Yakir, D. Association between carbonyl sulfide uptake and 18D during gas exchange in C3 and C4 leaves. Plant Physiol. 157, 509–517 (2011).
Terashima, I., Hanba, Y. T., Tazoe, Y., Vyas, P. & Yano, S. Irradiance and phenotype: comparative eco-development of sun and shade leaves in relation to photosynthetic CO2 diffusion. J. Exp. Bot. 57, 343–354 (2006).
Niinemets, U., Díaz-Espejo, A., Flexas, J., Galmés, J. & Warren, C. R. Role of mesophyll diffusion conductance in constraining potential photosynthetic productivity in the field. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 2249–2270 (2009).
Niinemets, U., Wright, I. J. & Evans, J. R. Leaf mesophyll diffusion conductance in 35 Australian sclerophylls covering a broad range of foliage structural and physiological variation. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 2433–2449 (2009).
Bernacchi, C. J., Portis, A. R., Nakano, H., von Caemmerer, S. & Long, S. P. Temperature response of mesophyll conductance. Implications for the determination of Rubisco enzyme kinetics and for limitations to photosynthesis in vivo. Plant Physiol. 130, 1992–1998 (2002).
Cano, F. J., López, R. & Warren, C. R. Implications of the mesophyll conductance to CO2 for photosynthesis and water-use efficiency during long-term water stress and recovery in two contrasting Eucalyptus species. Plant Cell Environ. 37, 2470–2490 (2014).
Dillaway, D. N. & Kruger, E. L. Thermal acclimation of photosynthesis: a comparison of boreal and temperate tree species along a latitudinal transect. Plant Cell Environ. 33, 888–899 (2010).
Campbell, J. E. et al. Photosynthetic control of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide during the growing season. Science 322, 1085–1088 (2008).
Stimler, K., Montzka, S. A., Berry, J. A., Rudich, Y. & Yakir, D. Relationships between carbonyl sulfide (COS) and CO2 during leaf gas exchange. New Phytol. 186, 869–878 (2010).
Kooijmans, L. M. J. et al. Influences of light and humidity on carbonyl sulfide-based estimates of photosynthesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 2470–2475 (2019).
Stimler, K., Berry, J. A. & Yakir, D. Effects of carbonyl sulfide and carbonic anhydrase on stomatal conductance. Plant Physiol. 158, 524–530 (2012).
Jung, M. et al. Global patterns of land-atmosphere fluxes of carbon dioxide, latent heat, and sensible heat derived from eddy covariance, satellite, and meteorological observations. J. Geophys. Res. 116, G00J07 (2011).
Joiner, J. et al. Estimation of terrestrial global gross primary production (GPP) with satellite data-driven models and eddy covariance flux data. Remote Sens. 10, 1346 (2018).
Li, X. & Xiao, J. Mapping photosynthesis solely from solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: a global, fine-resolution dataset of gross primary production derived from OCO-2. Remote Sens. 11, 2563 (2019).
Chen, J. M. et al. Effects of foliage clumping on the estimation of global terrestrial gross primary productivity. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 26, GB1019 (2012).
Jiang, C. & Ryu, Y. Multi-scale evaluation of global gross primary productivity and evapotranspiration products derived from Breathing Earth System Simulator (BESS). Remote Sens. Environ. 186, 528–547 (2016).
Running, S. W. et al. A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production. Bioscience 54, 547–560 (2004).
Li, X. & Xiao, J. A global, 0.05-degree product of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence derived from OCO-2, MODIS, and reanalysis data. Remote Sens. 11, 517 (2019).
Malhi, Y. et al. The Global Ecosystems Monitoring network: monitoring ecosystem productivity and carbon cycling across the tropics. Biol. Conserv. 253, 108889 (2021).
Restrepo-Coupe, N. et al. Do dynamic global vegetation models capture the seasonality of carbon fluxes in the Amazon basin? A data-model intercomparison. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 191–208 (2017).
Worden, J. et al. Satellite observations of the tropical terrestrial carbon balance and interactions with the water cycle during the 21st century. Rev. Geophys. 59, e2020RG000711 (2021).
Kuai, L. et al. Quantifying northern high latitude gross primary productivity (GPP) using carbonyl sulfide (OCS). Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 36, e2021GB007216 (2022).
Commane, R. et al. Seasonal fluxes of carbonyl sulfide in a midlatitude forest. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 14162–14167 (2015).
Ma, J. et al. Inverse modelling of carbonyl sulfide: implementation, evaluation and implications for the global budget. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21, 3507–3529 (2021).
Badger, M. R. & Price, G. D. The role of carbonic anhydrase in photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 45, 369–392 (1994).
Evans, J. R., Caemmerer, S. V., Setchell, B. A. & Hudson, G. S. The relationship between CO2 transfer conductance and leaf anatomy in transgenic tobacco with a reduced content of Rubisco. Funct. Plant Biol. 21, 475–495 (1994).
Ogée, J. et al. A new mechanistic framework to predict OCS fluxes from soils. Biogeosciences 13, 2221–2240 (2016).
Meredith, L. K. et al. Coupled biological and abiotic mechanisms driving carbonyl sulfide production in soils. Soil Systems 2, 37 (2018).
Meredith, L. K. et al. Soil exchange rates of COS and CO18O differ with the diversity of microbial communities and their carbonic anhydrase enzymes. ISME J. 13, 290–300 (2019).
Kaisermann, A., Jones, S. P., Wohl, S., Ogée, J. & Wingate, L. Nitrogen fertilization reduces the capacity of soils to take up atmospheric carbonyl sulphide. Soil Systems 2, 62 (2018).
Deepagoda, T. K. K. C. et al. Density‐corrected models for gas diffusivity and air permeability in unsaturated soil. Vadose Zone J. 10, 226–238 (2011).
Millington, R. J. & Quirk, J. P. Permeability of porous solids. Trans. Faraday Soc. 57, 1200–1207 (1961).
Asaf, D. et al. Ecosystem photosynthesis inferred from measurements of carbonyl sulphide flux. Nat. Geosci. 6, 186–190 (2013).
Restrepo-Coupe, N. et al. LBA-ECO CD-32 flux tower network data compilation, Brazilian Amazon: 1999−2006, V2. ORNL DAAC (2021).
Wohlfahrt, G., Hammerle, A., Spielmann, F., Kitz, F. & Yi, C. Technical note: Novel estimates of the leaf relative uptake rate of carbonyl sulfide from optimality theory. Biogeosciences 20, 589–596 (2023).
Wehr, R. et al. Seasonality of temperate forest photosynthesis and daytime respiration. Nature 534, 680–683 (2016).
In today’s fast-paced digital era, healthcare organizations are no exception to the power of digital…
Department of Neurology, Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Knight Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Washington University…
Download the Nature Podcast 16 October 2024In this episode:00:46 An unusual γ-ray producing microquasarA type…
Schrader, J. et al. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08036-1 (2024).Article Google Scholar Losos, J. B. & Ricklefs, R.…
Stevens, C. J., Dise, N. B., Mountford, J. O. & Gowing, D. J. Impact of…
Nature, Published online: 16 October 2024; doi:10.1038/d41586-024-03051-8Researchers have narrowed down the sources of the most…