Categories: NATURE

Study gauges grasslands’ climate-fighting powers


Plant more trees, cool the climate: It’s a message that readers of this website know well.

But new research confirms that this “rule” doesn’t apply everywhere. 

Take southern Africa: In some places, grasses are far more effective climate allies than trees.

Why? Grasses better reflect the sun’s radiation than darker, woody vegetation. This effect, called albedo,
is at work in a number of climate-related processes, particularly in polar regions, where sea ice and snow reflect much of the sun’s energy back into space, providing a cooling effect. (An ice-free Arctic Ocean, on the other hand, absorbs more
of the sun’s energy, hastening global warming.)

More or less the same principle applies with grasslands, said study co-author Heidi-Jayne Hawkins, a climate scientist at Conservation International’s affiliate in South Africa. 

“There’s a lot of emphasis on planting trees to mitigate climate change,” she said, “and that makes sense for areas that were forested and should be reforested. But this seemingly simple solution of planting trees isn’t applicable
for all areas. This paper shows why grasslands are so valuable by looking at another aspect of climate mitigation through cooling.”

© Trond Larsen

Grasses better reflect the sun’s radiation than darker, woody vegetation like trees.

The study compared albedo for different types of grasses and shrub vegetation in South Africa. Compared with shrubbery, the naturally lighter color of grasses
— combined with their dormant periods of faded color — resulted in higher reflectivity. Whether this translates directly to a cooler local environment requires further study. However, the value of this study is that it differentiates between
grass types, shrubs and land use at the patch scale.

The researchers also examined albedo for grasses and woody vegetation throughout the early, late and growing seasons to determine the effects of growth versus dormancy on albedo. Three different grasses — grazing lawn, red and white — were
analyzed and had different albedo values.

As expected, albedo was lower for grasses during their growing season due to the green color compared to their more bleached color when dormant.

The woody vegetation and trees analyzed were perennial and do not go into dormancy, so the albedo was not as affected by changing seasons. Hawkins noted that while the woody shrubbery analyzed in this study grows year-round, deciduous trees like those
in tropical savannas would likely have a bigger range in albedo due to their dormant stage and resulting leaf loss.

Taking the misguided effort of planting trees in grasslands out of the equation, even native trees may encroach. One reason for this is the loss of wild animals.

“Part of the story is that we’ve lost a lot of wild animals that used to control or remove woody vegetation — and which would have kept lands open for grasses,” Hawkins said.

Livestock, like cattle, have replaced wildlife such as elephants, which push down trees, browse on shrubs and, as a result, keep
lands more open for light-loving grasses to grow.

Increased efforts to conserve wildlife could prevent woody shrubs from encroaching in grasslands. In grazing areas, Hawkins suggests, farmers can choose domestic animals that mimic wildlife feeding behaviors like cattle or goats.

Trees and woody shrubs in grasslands can contribute to the severity of wildfires as well.

“Fire is a natural part of these ecosystems, but trees planted where they shouldn’t be makes it harder to control wildfires,” Hawkins said.

Grasslands’ albedo effect is only one of their climate benefits. Stretching across 40 percent of the planet, grasslands hold more than a third of the world’s land-based carbon in
their vast underground root and soil systems. 

Hawkins said she’s hopeful that the research will help boost understanding of grasslands as a climate ally.

“People seem to be getting the message that natural grasslands are as valuable as forests, and culturally important, not only for raising livestock but also for tourism and the wildlife that live there,” she said. “This study adds to
that value.”


Further reading:


Olivia DeSmit is a freelance writer at Conservation International. Want to read more stories like this? Sign up for email updates. Also, please consider supporting our critical work.



Source link

fromermedia@gmail.com

Share
Published by
fromermedia@gmail.com

Recent Posts

Cowabunga! Head Back to the 80s in TMNT: Shredder’s Revenge

You’ll join everyone’s favorite heroes in a half shell—Leonardo, Raphael, Donatello, Michelangelo—on a totally tubular…

16 hours ago

Eulerity Strengthens Team with Key Marketing Veteran Hires

The brand adds key hires to drive customer engagement and market expansion. NEW YORK, April…

16 hours ago

Southeast Asia doesn’t need fossil fuels for the AI data center boom

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance…

17 hours ago

Intel reportedly plans to lay off over 21,000 employees

Intel is set to cut over 21,000 people, or roughly 20% of its workforce, with…

3 days ago

8 Readers Share What They Love About Their Looks

What do you like about the way you look? Last week, we asked that question,…

3 days ago

Healthcare Hacks That Could Save You Thousands on the Journey to FIRE

Wealth and health are closely intertwined, especially here in the US, where the high cost…

3 days ago